WJPPS Citation

Login

Search

News & Updation

  • Journal web site support Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Saffari for easy download of article without any trouble.
  •  
  • Updated Version
  • WJPPS introducing updated version of OSTS (online submission and tracking system), which have dedicated control panel for both author and reviewer. Using this control panel author can submit manuscript
  • Call for Paper
    • WJPPS  Invited to submit your valuable manuscripts for Coming Issue.
  • ICV
  • WJPPS Rank with Index Copernicus Value 84.65 due to high reputation at International Level

  • Scope Indexed
  • WJPPS is indexed in Scope Database based on the recommendation of the Content Selection Committee (CSC).

  • WJPPS: New Impact Factor 2026
  • WJPPS Impact Factor has been Increased to 8.485 for Year 2026.

  • WJPPS: MARCH ISSUE PUBLISHED
  • MARCH 2026 Issue has been successfully launched on 1 MARCH 2026.

Abstract

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE POTENCY OF ANTIMALARIAL DRUGS ON MALARIA PATIENTS USING BIOASSAY METHOD

Ucheokoro Adaeze S.*, Ogoke Uchenna P.

ABSTRACT

Background: Bioassay remains a critical method for evaluating the relative potency of antimalarial drugs, particularly in resource-limited settings where pharmacokinetic studies are challenging. Establishing parallelism between dose-response curves of test and standard preparations is a fundamental prerequisite for valid potency estimation in indirect bioassays. Objective: This study assessed the potency of four generic antimalarial brands (Drugs A, B, C, D) relative to a standard formulation using clinical recovery time in 80 malaria patients. Methods: An indirect assay design was employed, measuring time (hours) to recovery after complete dosage. Parallelism was tested using three established methods: F-test, χ²-test, and equivalence testing via JMP software version 17. A 4-parameter logistic (4PL) model characterized dose-response curves. One-way ANOVA assessed variation among formulations, with bioequivalence declared when 90% confidence intervals fell within predefined limits. Results: The 4PL model demonstrated excellent fit (R² = 93.3%, AIC = 465.53). ANOVA confirmed significant variation among antimalarial drugs (p < 0.0001). However, parallelism testing failed across all methods: F-test (p = 0.0094) and χ²-test (p = 0.0001), both < 0.05. Graphical analysis revealed non-parallel dose-response curves, with inconsistent logarithmic spacing and horizontal shifts. Consequently, relative potency calculations were invalid due to violation of the parallelism assumption. Conclusion: The failure of parallelism testing prevented potency estimation, suggesting potential degradation of the reference standard or formulation inconsistencies. This underscores the critical importance of parallelism validation in bioassays and highlights the need for quality assurance of reference standards. The study recommends reviewing standard preparation protocols and conducting replicate assays with fresh reference materials to ensure reliable comparative potency assessments for antimalarial drugs.

Keywords: Bioassay, Parallelism testing, Relative potency, Antimalarial drugs, 4-Parameter logistic model, Dose-response curves.


[Download Article]     [Download Certifiate]

Call for Paper

World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (WJPPS)
Read More

Online Submission

World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (WJPPS)
Read More

Email & SMS Alert

World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (WJPPS)
Read More