WJPPS Citation

Login

Search

News & Updation

  • Journal web site support Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Saffari for easy download of article without any trouble.
  •  
  • Updated Version
  • WJPPS introducing updated version of OSTS (online submission and tracking system), which have dedicated control panel for both author and reviewer. Using this control panel author can submit manuscript
  • Call for Paper
    • WJPPS  Invited to submit your valuable manuscripts for Coming Issue.
  • ICV
  • WJPPS Rank with Index Copernicus Value 84.65 due to high reputation at International Level

  • Scope Indexed
  • WJPPS is indexed in Scope Database based on the recommendation of the Content Selection Committee (CSC).

  • WJPPS: New Impact Factor 2026
  • WJPPS Impact Factor has been Increased to 8.485 for Year 2026.

  • WJPPS: MARCH ISSUE PUBLISHED
  • MARCH 2026 Issue has been successfully launched on 1 MARCH 2026.

Abstract

QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF 2% LIDOCAINE INJECTABLE SOLUTIONS USED IN DENTAL CLINICS IN YAOUNDE, CAMEROON

Soppo Lobe Charlotte Vanessa*, Nokam Marie Elvire, Biwole Steven Olivier,
Benga Mekoulou Chimène Felecité, Nnanga Nga

ABSTRACT

Background: Local anesthetics, particularly 2% lidocaine, are essential in dental practice. The quality of injectable formulations directly affects patient safety and therapeutic effectiveness. Substandard medicines remain a concern in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: To evaluate the physicochemical, microbiological, and labeling quality of 2% lidocaine injectable solutions used in dental clinics in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Methods: A descriptive and analytical study was conducted between November 2018 and July 2019. Fifteen batches of 2% lidocaine were collected from 11 dental clinics using consecutive sampling. Each batch underwent labeling inspection, visual examination, microbiological testing, pH measurement, and active ingredient assay using UV-visible spectrophotometry. Results were expressed as means ± standard deviation, proportions, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: Among the 15 batches analyzed, 80% originated from India, 13% from France, and 7% from Spain. Two batches (13.3%; 95% CI: 1.7–40.5%) showed labeling non-conformities. All samples were clear and sterile. Four batches (26.7%; 95% CI: 7.8–55.1%) had pH values below pharmacopoeial standards. The lidocaine concentration was compliant in all samples (mean: 2.01% ± 0.04%; 95% CI: 1.97–2.05%). Conclusion: Most analyzed batches complied with quality standards; however, labeling deficiencies and pH deviations were observed. Regular quality control and strengthened pharmaceutical surveillance are recommended.

Keywords: Quality control; Lidocaine 2%; Injectable drugs; Dental anesthesia; Cameroon.


[Download Article]     [Download Certifiate]

Call for Paper

World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (WJPPS)
Read More

Online Submission

World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (WJPPS)
Read More

Email & SMS Alert

World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (WJPPS)
Read More