

![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
| All | Since 2020 | |
| Citation | 6651 | 4087 |
| h-index | 26 | 21 |
| i10-index | 174 | 83 |
Search
News & Updation
CURRENT DEFICIENCIES IN SCHEDULEY
Anni Selviya*
ABSTRACT To investigate "up-to-date" and "age-appropriate" indicators of preschool vaccination status and their implications for vaccination policy. The authors analyzed medical records data from the Baltimore Immunization Study for 525 2-year-olds born from August 1988 through March 1989 to mothers living in low-income Census tracts of the city of Baltimore. While only 54% of 24-month-old children were up-to-date for the primary series, indicators of up- to-date coverage were consistently higher, by 37 or more percentage points, than corresponding age-appropriate indicators. Almost 80% of children who failed to receive the first dose of DTP or OPV age-appropriately failed to be up-to-date by 24 months of age for the primary series. Age-appropriate immunization indicators more accurately reflect adequacy of protection forpre schoolers than up-to-date indicators at both the individual and population levels. Age-appropriate receipt of the first dose of DTP should be monitored to identify children likely to be under immunized. Age-appropriate indicators should also be incorporated as vaccination coverage estimators in population-based surveys and as quality of care indicators for managed care organizations. These changes would require accurate dates for each vaccination and support the need to develop population-based registries. Keywords: . [Download Article] [Download Certifiate] |
