WJPPS Citation

Login

Search

News & Updation

  • Updated Version
  • WJPPS introducing updated version of OSTS (online submission and tracking system), which have dedicated control panel for both author and reviewer. Using this control panel author can submit manuscript
  • Call for Paper
    • WJPPS  Invited to submit your valuable manuscripts for Coming Issue.
  • Journal web site support Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Saffari for easy download of article without any trouble.
  •  
  • New Impact Factor
  • WJPPS Impact Factor has been Increased to 8.025 for Year 2024.

  • WJPPS: MAY ISSUE PUBLISHED
  • May Issue has been successfully launched on 1 May 2024.

  • ICV
  • WJPPS Rank with Index Copernicus Value 84.65 due to high reputation at International Level

  • Scope Indexed
  • WJPPS is indexed in Scope Database based on the recommendation of the Content Selection Committee (CSC).

Abstract

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TEMPORALIS FASCIA AND FASCIA LATA AS GRAFT MATERIAL IN TYMPANOPLASTY

Dr. Margi Patel*, Dr. Nehal Patel, Dr. Alpesh Patel, Dr. Deepti Tulsiyani and Dr. Akash Desai

ABSTRACT

Background: Tympanoplasty is the operative procedure performed to repair the tympanic membrane perforation and to improve hearing level. The materials used range from fascia, perichondrium, duramater, skin, homograft and autograft to synthetic prosthetic material. In this study, we have compared the use of temporalis fascia and fascia lata as graft material in tympanoplasty and compare with postoperative graft taken up and hearing assessment i.e. Pre and post operatively hearing assessment. Methodology: Patients with Chronic otitis media having large, subtotal or total central perforation with >25dB conductive hearing loss were operated with Tympanoplasty. Grafts used were either temporalis fascia or fascia lata. Patients were randomly selected for each group. Results: Graft take up rate for both fascia lata and temporalis fascia was 95 %. Graft Uptake was not dependent on type of graft but it depended on size of perforation. Smaller and moderate perforations had better uptake than large perforations. Hearing gain in temporalis fascia was 30.5 dB and in fascia lata was 30 dB. Conclusion: Overall graft uptake rate and Hearing improvement were almost equal with both temporalis fascia and fascia lata. Graft Up take was not dependent on type of graft but it depended on size of perforation. Small and moderate perforations had better uptake than large perforations. Temporalis Fascia is used frequently as compared to fascia lata as it is easily available in sufficient quantity and for harvesting separate incision is not required.

Keywords: Tympanoplasty, temporalis fascia, fascia Lata.


[Download Article]     [Download Certifiate]

Call for Paper

World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (WJPPS)
Read More

Online Submission

World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (WJPPS)
Read More

Email & SMS Alert

World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (WJPPS)
Read More